Confused?

What do you really think Rep. Garcia? Is the truth your statement issued early today (posted below) or this video of the 4pm Thursday Newscast from Channel 13 in Albuquerque? Rep. Garcia speaks at about 1:20 in the story.

House panel shoots down gay marriage

Constitutional Amendments Too Stringent: Setting the Record Straight By State Rep. Mary Helen Garcia, District 34

Over the last several days people have been talking back and forth about my votes on minimum wage and same sex marriage. While I believe I was elected to use my own judgment, I would like the record to reflect my thoughts.

The media has taken what I have said out of context, I apologize if anyone believes that I set out to intentionally hurt anyone. I stand on my record, which will clearly show that I have spent my entire career putting people first.

Regardless of how I personally feel about either issue, as the Chairwoman of Voters and Elections I believe that minimum wage and same sex marriage do not belong on the ballot. By this I mean that both issues were brought before my committee as constitutional amendments, which means that both issues would have to be put on the ballot in the next election cycle.

As everyone knows the Legislative process requires the approval of both houses and the executive branch. This process serves a purpose and provides the best opportunity for citizen involvement and fair representation. While it might be an idealistic view, I believe that the Legislative process should be respected except in a case of dire emergency.

Again I believe that the issues of minimum wage and same sex marriage are issues that should be debated, compromised, and scrutinized by the legislature, not manipulated for political gain. I do not believe that either issue met the requirements to disregard the principles of the legislative process.

While I believe constitutional amendments serve a purpose, we must realize that the constitutional amendment process is much more stringent than that required of ordinary legislation.

 

Defeat of HJR3 Disrespects Gay Community

New Mexico GLBTQ Centers responded today to the defeat in the New Mexico House Voters and Elections Committee of HJR3, the marriage equality amendment.

Centers' Executive Director, David Stocum, responded, “Despite passionate pleas from bill sponsor Brian Eglof and House Speaker Martinez, Las Cruces Representative and committee Chair Mary Helen Garcia was one of two Democrats to vote with Republicans to table HJR3 effectively killing it.” Stocum also stated, “The gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community is especially disappointed with Rep. Garcia since we believed her to be our friend.”

New Mexico GLBTQ Centers sent the following letter to Rep. Garcia via email:

“I am dismayed and disappointed with your vote killing HJR3. Your vote denied the respect for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (glbt) community in New Mexico that we deserve.

Despite the long history of New Mexican's having the backs of our friends and family along with the belief by most in our state that we should treat others the way we would like to be treated, you voted to leave over 45,000 New Mexicans (from Movement Advancement Project) out in the cold.

This is not a complicated issue, it is about respecting all families in New Mexico, including mine.

My partner, Richard, and I have been together 13 years, and given the opportunity, would love to share our commitment surrounded by our friends, family and neighbors, and to have the security and protections that only marriage will give us.

We share the worries of other couples, like making ends meet, the possibility of losing our income, and making sure that we can offer the safety and security that our loved ones deserve. As foster parents, we have the same concerns as all parents ... supporting our kids success in school, keeping them safe and away from gangs, drugs and the dangers of being a kid in the 21st century. We are no different than any other couple, gay or straight, in New Mexico.

Yet we, and all glbt couples, are disrespected and that disrespect is sanctioned by our elected officials like yourself with this unfortunate vote. What does this say to a glbt youth being bullied in school? This is not a religious issue. I, and most in the glbt community, strongly support religious freedom. Marriage equality is a civil matter. Allowing Richard and I to marry won't change anything for churches or ministers. No pastor or priest would be required to marry a same sex couple. It would allow those ministers and churches who support marriage to marry same sex couples. This means freedom for all religions to follow the teachings of their faith.

I hope that you and all New Mexicans will reflect on what marriage equality is really about, fairness, respect and dignity for all New Mexican families.”